See What Your Next Case is Worth The clarity to commit, the confidence to win.
Evaluate the case, understand the opportunity, and continue with PLCP, all in one place.

A medical cost projection is an early estimate of what an injured person's future care may cost, while a life care plan is a physician-authored, line-by-line valuation of that care built to be defended in court. The projection helps a firm decide how to proceed. The plan gives a firm a physician-backed figure it can defend.
Previdi by PLCP sits where the two meet. Built by Physician Life Care Planning, which has produced physician-authored life care plans since 2011, the platform pairs AI-driven case evaluation with a direct path into PLCP expert services. This guide explains how the two documents differ and where each fits:
A medical cost projection is an estimate of the future medical expenses tied to an injury, built from the conditions documented in the medical records. It gives a firm a working number early, before the expense of full case development is committed.
Projections come in more than one form. Previdi RangeFinder benchmarks documented injuries and diagnoses against PLCP's Intelligence Core, which draws on over 1 million future medical requirements, and returns an estimated range by life care plan category. A PLCP Medical Cost Assessment is a physician-authored projection scaled for early evaluation, mediation, and alternative dispute resolution.
Both reflect what the records support. Incomplete records or gaps in care can shift the result.
A life care plan is a comprehensive, individualized document that lays out an injured person's anticipated lifetime care needs and the cost of each one. According to AAPM&R, the plan gathers facts from records, interviews, and patient examination, then draws conclusions about future needs and cost.
A PLCP life care plan follows the standards of the American Academy of Physician Life Care Planners and is authored by a board-certified physician. It covers future medical expenses line by line, and loss of earnings and household services can be added when a case calls for them.
Because the plan is built for litigation, its author is prepared to explain and defend each recommendation under oath.
The two documents differ most in who prepares them, how much detail they carry, and whether a physician stands behind them in court.
| Factor | Medical Cost Projection | Life Care Plan |
| Purppose | Early estimate of future medical costs to guide case decisions | Full valuation of lifetime care needs and costs for settlement trial |
| Prepared by |
RangeFinder: AI-assisted benchmarking of uploaded records. Medical Cost Assessment: a board-certified physician |
A board-certified physician, with forensic economists and vocational specialists as needed |
| Basis |
Injuries and diagnoses are documented in the medical records |
Records, interview or examination, and physician analysis of each care item |
| Scope |
Future medical expenses |
Future medical expenses, with loss of earnings and household services available as added services |
| Testimony |
RangeFinder is a decision-support tool, not a court exhibit. A Medical Cost Assessment is designed to stand as evidence without testimony |
The authority physician can testify in state and federal courts |
| Standard timing |
RangeFinder: evaluation in hours. Medical Cost Assessment: 4 weeks |
6 weeks, with expedited options |
| Best suited for |
Early evaluation, mediation, and lower-limit policy cases |
Cases that may go to trial or carry significant future care needs |
An AI-assisted projection and a physician-authored document carry different weight because different people stand behind them. Previdi uses AI to parse records and benchmark documented conditions, and it does not make legal, clinical, or case judgments. RangeFinder results support decisions inside a firm and are not meant to be offered as an exhibit.
Medical Cost Assessments and life care plans are authored by board-certified physicians at PLCP, who can testify in state and federal courts nationwide. That matters because expert opinion must clear a reliability bar. Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which governs expert testimony in federal court, requires the proponent to show it is more likely than not that the testimony rests on sufficient facts or data, reliable methods, and a reliable application of those methods to the case.
A named physician who can explain the methodology under cross-examination gives that showing a foundation.
Every projection starts with the records and moves through four steps in Previdi:
The Intelligence Core is an aggregate of physician-authored work. It is not built from plaintiff data, firm data, or any individually identifiable information. Because the range reflects the records uploaded, a complete set from the date of injury forward supports the most accurate estimate.
Compared with an early projection, a life care plan adds a physician's full case-specific review, itemized care needs, and a witness who can defend both. A Medical Cost Assessment shares the plan's physician-authored methodology at a narrower scope, so these differences apply most fully to an AI-assisted projection such as RangeFinder.
Physician review comes first. Through PLCP's ClearView Process, physicians assess the injury, gather records, and conduct an interview or examination before forming opinions. Specific care items follow, with future needs and their costs projected line by line across the person's lifetime rather than summarized as a range.
Testimony completes the picture. The authoring physician can explain the plan's methodology, answer cross-examination, and update the plan if the case changes, so the figure can be supported well beyond the demand letter.
Cost projections are enough when the goal is direction rather than a courtroom opinion. Common situations include:
Personal injury attorney Darius Crayton of Farris, Riley & Pitt used RangeFinder this way on a head-on collision case. He reported that the benchmarked range gave him more confidence in his conversations with the insurance company, and the evaluation led his team to consider a life care plan as the next step. Customer stories include more firm experiences.
Full life care plans become necessary when the future care figure will be contested or must be supported by a testifying physician. That usually means a case headed toward trial, one involving serious or long-term injuries, or one where recommended surgeries and ongoing treatment make future costs difficult to dispute without expert support.
Early findings can signal the shift. Partner James C. Mattox III of Mattox Law Firm saw Previdi surface a range above his first assessment, along with injuries his team had not fully captured, and the findings led him to contact PLCP about an expert review of the file.
Firms unsure which product fits can use the "Which Are Right for Me" tool inside Previdi. Case evaluations, uploaded records, and case data carry forward, so nothing has to be resubmitted.
Used in sequence, each document answers the question that matters at its stage of a case:
Senior paralegal Katie Mast of Varghese Summersett PLLC described the value of this continuity, noting that a tool used before litigation could carry into litigation and then into an expert care plan, all in one place.
Is a medical cost projection the same as a life care plan?
No. A projection estimates future medical costs from documented conditions, while a life care plan is a comprehensive, itemized valuation of lifetime care needs prepared to be defended in court.
Can a medical cost projection be used in court?
It depends on the form. RangeFinder supports internal case decisions and is not a court exhibit. A PLCP Medical Cost Assessment is designed to stand as material evidence without requiring testimony, while a life care plan is built for cases where the physician may testify.
How long does each take?
RangeFinder delivers a structured evaluation within hours of record upload. PLCP's standard delivery is four weeks for a Medical Cost Assessment and six weeks for a life care plan, with expedited options for both.
Do I need a projection before ordering a life care plan?
No. Firms that already know a case needs expert support can request a PLCP expert service directly and skip the evaluation.
Do I have to use PLCP after a Previdi evaluation?
No. A Previdi evaluation stands on its own. If a case warrants full development, an expert service can be requested from inside the platform, and the records and case data carry forward.
A cost projection tells a firm where a case may be headed, and a life care plan puts a physician behind the figure. Previdi by PLCP brings both under one roof, backed by physicians who have authored life care plans since 2011. Book a demo to see a real case evaluated in 20 minutes.
The information on this page is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Sources
Evaluate the case, understand the opportunity, and continue with PLCP, all in one place.